http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 Comments posted on this skin. Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:03 -0600 Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:37:03 -0600 http://www.blogskins.com/ http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 This looks cool. But why can't I see the post area in the preview? (0 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:20:15 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (melissa1990) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 I'm not too sure about that, refer to live preview please. (0 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:23:00 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (paradoxical-lilium) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 this is cool #.# (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:30:22 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (lsl2806) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 ooh. i love the img! and a preview error yeah? hahaks . five stars (X and and. care to rate my latest skin? thanks (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:33:49 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (&&ana-) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 Wow! This skin has so much depth and literary features to it. The image is also very beautiful. To put it simply, this skin is coolness beyond words. (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:33:56 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (coldwindz) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 Just to clarify: I have no idea why in the Blogskins preview the entry box does not show out. For accurate preview please refer to the live preview. The link is stated above in the description. The 'girl' featured is actually a brush from Kali Jean, the set of brushes named, "Wedding". (0 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:42:01 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (paradoxical-lilium) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 OMG (: (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:57:31 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com ([[>>//MiissPiiggy\\<<]]) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 XPG! i love the picture ;D ahahahhas. (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 06:42:14 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (xday-dreamerzx) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 i like the coding, xiao ping! (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 06:49:05 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (purpl3d) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 × (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 07:27:51 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (englishsucks.) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 very bad image quality? rather pixellated. the words are still ok. the codings are nice. but i can't grade on that. since it is from lisee. (0 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:29:27 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com ([DELETED USER]) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 the image isnt of very good quality, to be honest. (5 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:55:00 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com ({/autumnlove♥) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 xpg you subbed :O but the colours of the image isnt really nice/attractive. yeah the words saved it. (: (0 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:32:57 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (unriven/}) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 -.- Image pixellated meh?! (0 stars) Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:12:21 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (paradoxical-lilium) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 i agree with the image part and i think more thought can be put into the colour combination. (x (0 stars) Sun, 09 Sep 2007 03:52:41 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (intrigue.d) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 Hmmm. I guess its the brush, glenboyy. intrigue.d: ain't good to have too many colours though. (0 stars) Sun, 09 Sep 2007 09:03:18 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (paradoxical-lilium) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 the image looks really pixelated and it was near spam brush. but its quite neat yeah. i personally thought the colour combination was fine. (5 stars) Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:01:44 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (liketragic!) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 liketragic!: I used the brush to make the image. Does that still qualify as brush spam? As for the image looking pixellated, I suppose it is the size of the image. (0 stars) Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:05:59 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (paradoxical-lilium) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 hahahha no. i said it was near spam brush. not saying that it is. (0 stars) Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:55:12 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (liketragic!) http://www.blogskins.com/info/158355 of coz its pixelatted! aren't all pictures made of pixels? (0 stars) Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:03:32 -0500 nobody@blogskins.com (illusioNATION)