ANTI DA VINCI CODE.;ilu

I am anti da vinci code.
You should be too.

IF YOU ARE IGNORANT TO THE HAPPENINGS TO DO WITH THIS BOOK, dun even bother trying to make a point here. It's pointless.

NOTE :t isn't a defense to say that The Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction. Fiction can't change the basic facts about major historical figures without being subject to criticism. People would be outraged if Doubleday printed a novel portraying Adolph Hitler in a positive light. Christians have a right to be outraged when the basic historical facts about Christ are falsified. The criticism will be even more intense when a publisher releases a book parodying the most sacred beliefs of others in this fashion.

Further, as we have seen in this special report, the book takes great pains to create the appearance of factuality, including placing the infamous "fact" page at the beginning of the novel. Brown has stressed the ostensible accuracy of the book on his web site and in interviews. This is not a case where an author and a publisher have produced an ordinary novel. They have gone to great lengths to mislead people into thinking that the novel has a historical basis. They deserve especially sharp criticism for this, and when criticism is made they cannot hypocritically hide behind the "It's just fiction" allegation after having made such extensive efforts to convince the reader that it is not "just fiction.

Vatican City has denouncing it.
I am too.
It is attacking the very roots this religion is built on.

And yes. I love the Mona Lisa. I think it is a wonderful piece of work. I pity Mr Da Vinci and his Mona lisa. They are innocent victims in this crossfire.

And YES, as least i put a disclaimer. Unlike the book.

DISCLIAMER : This skin is also meant to be fictional. Like its book counterpart.

VIVA FREEDOM OF SPEECH!