I'm sorry but according to the dictionary, plagiarism is defined as taking someone's words or ideas as if they were your own. [You might want to google it] In this case, it is pretty obvious that the images were the same, positions were almost the same, colour theme also the same. So unless you want to argue that simply because of the fact that she used textures instead of glows negate her fault of plagiarising the images, the positions and also the colour theme, I am pretty sure that this is a form of plagiarism.

If however, you insist on the use of textures instead of glows negate her responsibility of plagiarism, I would like to raise an example of imitation bags. I'm sure if you visit Malaysia, China, Vietnam or any developing asian nations, its not uncommon to see imitations who merely change their names from LV to 7X. Even though they changed their names, LV can still press charges against imitation goods because of the similarity in design, colour and theme. Similar to this case, its a clear violation of intellectual property.

As for the use of the word fool, unless you can rebutt my above point, I believe this word best describe he/she who fails to prove his/her point of view.

sorry but plagiarism wont get you far. I'm sure its such a cosmic coincidence that your skin actually looks like hers. Lets just leave it at the probability of that happening is near negligible eh?